Further Light and Knowledge

FLAK Statistics, a graph of posts per day.
NEW! Archive of The View from the Foyer.
It is currently Thu May 23, 2013 5:55 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 5:31 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 4:10 pm
Posts: 600
Today on Radio West on KUER, 11:00 am MDT:

Earlier this month at the LDS Church

_________________
Big doubt, big awakening
Small doubt, small awakening
No doubt, no awakening


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 6:08 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:23 am
Posts: 431
Location: South of Liberty
I'm having problems connecting. Damn!

Edit: And then I remember that I live in town and I could actually listen on a radio! Crazy old school.

_________________
Do you have what it takes to be unstoppable?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:17 pm 
Active Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 11:23 pm
Posts: 26
Location: Rocky Mountain High
Looks like a podcast will show up soon.

http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/kuer/ ... ID=1170221


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 7:54 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 5:23 am
Posts: 431
Location: South of Liberty
The show was really pretty interesting to listen to. The host had three guests: Dorothy Allred Solomon, author of The Sisterhood: Inside the Lives of Mormon Women, Julie Smith who blogs on Times and Seasons, and Marie Cornwall who is a professor of sociology at BYU. The host mentioned at one point that they had tried Friday to have either Julie Beck herself, or someone else officially representing the organization, but that sort of thing has to be approved by the highest levels, and they did not have enough time to get that approval. :roll:

I missed about the first ten minutes of the show, but here are some of the notes I took on what I heard. The host seemed to maintain a mostly unbiased view, though he did take it upon himself to try at dig at what each woman really thought.

One of the first things I heard as I tuned in, was MC's statement that on average, working women of today are spending just as much time with the SAHM's (stay-at-home moms) of the 60s. They accomplish this by spending less time cleaning, and by spending their leisure time with their children.

They discussed the bloggernacle's reaction to the talk, mentioning that a thread on one blog had over 400 comments before the end of that session of conference. Just illustrating that it was, and is a very hot topic. JS stated that she thought at least part of it was due to the bloggernacle being a specific subset of the church, not necessarily wholly representative of the church. She said she'd heard a lot of positive reaction in discussions in her local ward. She said she felt a lot of women were looking for less of the "we're all fine" sort of talk. They've wanted more of a "call to repentance" sort of talk, and that these women found a challenge in Beck's statements.

Several times throughout the discussion it was brought up that part of the difficultly of this sort of thing is that there is no real forum for women to discuss difficult decisions. The idea that one woman may feel called to more of a public service role than to motherhood, but that she has nowhere to go to talk about that choice with other LDS women.

There was plenty of talk of compassion for women who would feel marginalized by this talk. That they don't, won't, or can't have children, and end up feeling that they have no place in the saints because of it. JS mentioned that she felt this talk was directed specifically to mothers, rather than women as a whole, and she stated she felt there was very little from the pulpit directed to mothers specifically. MC then brought up her feeling that both the talk, and the radio discussion dealt with only one part of the motherhood in the church, those in the middle to upper-middle class that have the option of staying home in the first place. She didn't feel the talk really addressed mothers in the working class that have to work to keep their family in a home.

JS then countered that there was nothing in the talk that said that mothers had to be full time mothers. The host asked what was wrong with saying that LDS mothers should mother full time. JS said that she felt the talk dealt with the "essence of mothering" and not necessarily the specific tasks of ironing, dishes, etc. That it was a call to the question of who is teaching the children, who is bringing them up. MC (who seemed pretty progressive through the whole discussion) talked about the trend of more men getting involved in the housekeeping, and of spreading the work out among the family to improve the time spent together.

A woman named Louisa called in, you could hear at least one small child making noise in the background. She mentioned that she was a SAHM, and, starting to sound a little teary, at first she felt very put down by the talk. She said that she then realized that mormons should be held to a different standard than the rest of the world, and she then found the talk uplifting. After she got off the line, the host asked, why did this talk not seem to give anyone a break? Why must they create more guilt for not doing enough? DAS replied that this was one of the big concerns in reaction to the talk. She said she was concerned about the guilt the talk could create among the members, but then she agreed that it was a call back to focus on the children. She also said that the divorce rate has skyrocketed since women entered the work-force.

MC stated that one trap people get into is the idea that only mormons care about their kids. She said the place where most kids get left alone is among the working class. She also said that the divorce rate is coming down among the college educated.

Kyle called in to say he was very grateful to his mother staying home, because he was having troubles in school and the year she home schooled him gave him the chance to really succeed. Reina called in to say she was a convert, her husband makes 30,000 dollars a year, they have four kids, and she was not offended by the talk at all. He then read an email from a woman named Jo who said the talk reminded her of an 80s movie about mormon women and depression (anyone know the reference?). She felt that the talk simply meant that no matter what you were doing, there was always something more to do, and that your best just wasn't good enough.

JS said she felt that the talk was to be taken on a basis of personal revelation. The host countered with "you can't just say she was wrong?" JS said she felt she could see the wisdom in it BUT (that word always gets me) it wasn't for everyone's situation. She said it was a call to growth, but should not be seen as a new bat to beat oneself over the head. She also mentioned feeling very schizoid about the whole thing (cog dis anyone?).

The host asked CM how realistic is it for women these days to stay home. Her answer: not very. Even just working part time is getting harder, because women often need the full time hours to make up for a lack of insurance from the husband's job. There was again mention that the talk didn't require that women be full time mothers. She then it increased the amount of work for women, because now they're working, and they have to worry about the kids, and clean.

In the end, the host asked what LDS women want to hear from their leaders. DAS replied that women want to know that they are free to be themselves, that their voices are heard, and that each of them has a place in the body of the saints. MC said she wanted to hear the truthfulness of the gospel and guidance to be good saints as a whole, because no one can speak for or to all women, because there is no universal woman. JS concurred that women were too diverse to direct just one message to all of them.

So there you go, I tried to take notes as they went along, but if anyone can find a transcript anywhere, it'd be even better.

_________________
Do you have what it takes to be unstoppable?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:23 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:02 pm
Posts: 4217
Location: Texas
It's such bullshit to say the talk did not criticize working mothers--that was the essence of the talk for chrissakes! She quoted ET Benson from the talk where he basically called working moms the devil's apprentices. Beck used code words but there was no mention of anything positive at all for any working Mormon mother. The so-called Mormon feminists who characterize this talk as anything other than a screed against working moms are discussing the talk they WISH Beck had given; not the one she actually gave.

_________________
"Let go of what you know and honor what exists."--David Bazan

http://www.equalitysblog.typepad.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:25 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 2:25 pm
Posts: 2065
Location: Houston, Texas
Equality wrote:
The so-called Mormon feminists who characterize this talk as anything other than a screed against working moms are discussing the talk they WISH Beck had given; not the one she actually gave.


Aren't they just following Robert Millet's advice to give the answer to the question they should have been asked?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:37 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:17 am
Posts: 7338
Equality wrote:
It's such bullshit to say the talk did not criticize working mothers--that was the essence of the talk for chrissakes! She quoted ET Benson from the talk where he basically called working moms the devil's apprentices. Beck used code words but there was no mention of anything positive at all for any working Mormon mother. The so-called Mormon feminists who characterize this talk as anything other than a screed against working moms are discussing the talk they WISH Beck had given; not the one she actually gave.

Cognitive dissonance, my friend, cognitive dissonance.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:40 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:02 pm
Posts: 4217
Location: Texas
cumom wrote:
Equality wrote:
It's such bullshit to say the talk did not criticize working mothers--that was the essence of the talk for chrissakes! She quoted ET Benson from the talk where he basically called working moms the devil's apprentices. Beck used code words but there was no mention of anything positive at all for any working Mormon mother. The so-called Mormon feminists who characterize this talk as anything other than a screed against working moms are discussing the talk they WISH Beck had given; not the one she actually gave.

Cognitive dissonance, my friend, cognitive dissonance.


Indeed. And to think I actually read Festinger's work BEFORE I joined the church. D'oh!

_________________
"Let go of what you know and honor what exists."--David Bazan

http://www.equalitysblog.typepad.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 9:57 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:15 pm
Posts: 4832
Location: Saarbrücken
It is sad to see how an intelligent woman is twisting her mind into bretzels to preserve orthodoxy. I don't think that Julie realizes how much her rationalizing is imposing on other people.

Doubt is a good thing, Julie. It's the foundation of freedom.

_________________
Love before loyalty, people before the organization, and principle before the tribe.
Main Street Plaza


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:28 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 4:14 am
Posts: 3667
Screed? Bretzels? So many new words.... (Though I am assuming the second one should have been pretzels..)

I've talked with people (read Mormon wives and mothers) who said that they really enjoyed the talk. That it uplifted them. That they felt inspired to do better than they had been.

I just don't get it.

_________________
Sometimes I make my kids wear sombreros and scuba fins around the house. Not because there is any reason. I just want to teach them obedience.--Darth J


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:41 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 10:15 pm
Posts: 4832
Location: Saarbrücken
SillyNut wrote:
Screed? Bretzels? So many new words.... (Though I am assuming the second one should have been pretzels..)

O, I forgot the transliteration. Bretzels with P are just too much for me. Prost!
Image

_________________
Love before loyalty, people before the organization, and principle before the tribe.
Main Street Plaza


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 23, 2007 10:57 pm 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:20 pm
Posts: 1024
Location: Texas
SillyNut wrote:
I've talked with people (read Mormon wives and mothers) who said that they really enjoyed the talk. That it uplifted them. That they felt inspired to do better than they had been.

I just don't get it.


I've talked to people who said the same thing after going through the Endowment for the first time.

The TBM faithful will convince themselves that they have been edified and spiritually fed no matter what they just heard. Or saw. Or pantomimed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:12 am 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:46 pm
Posts: 2248
Location: Salt Lake City
lyndistine wrote:
The host mentioned at one point that they had tried Friday to have either Julie Beck herself, or someone else officially representing the organization, but that sort of thing has to be approved by the highest levels, and they did not have enough time to get that approval.


The house of the Lord is one of order, triplicate, and delays.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 12:52 am 
Election Made Sure
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:17 pm
Posts: 2709
Location: Gods Country
Good work lindistyne,

talked about the trend of more men getting involved in the housekeeping, and of spreading the work out among the family to improve the time spent together.

If a guy helped clean house, I am sure that the PH holders would call him whipped. Some guys hold their PH dear.

_________________
CW

The universe likes to laugh at us


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 5:48 am 
Guardian Angel - Emeritus
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:03 am
Posts: 3300
Location: The middle of the jello belt
Thanks for the great notes, Lyndistine! It is my hope that this Beck thing continues to churn.

Big green hugs,

Froggie

_________________
"Mormon culture is a combination of well-intentioned naïveté, the Stepford Wives, and the Holy Inquisition." ~Dr.Todd Ormsbee
http://froggey.wordpress.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron

Protected by Anti-Spam ACP Powered by phpBB® © thefoyer.org, 2011